Cases 41 - 50 of 65
HASANATI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
JAHI AMADI HASANATI
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dausch, Jr. v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, et al.
as 5:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Dausch, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Robyn Ragsdale, Curt Schuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipps v. Prosecutor, State of Florida Division #62 et al
as 6:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Ra P. Shipps
Defendant:
Prosecutor, State of Florida Division #62 and Prosecutors to be named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Scott v. Broward Prosecutor
as 0:2015cv60726
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Scott
Defendant:
Broward Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Napoleoni v. State Attorney et al
as 0:2015cv60524
Plaintiff:
Paul Napoleoni
Defendant:
State Attorney, Broward County Clerk of the Courts and Broward County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Public Prosecutor v. Kameshwar
as 3:2014mc00053
Plaintiff:
Public Prosecutor
Defendant:
Lakum Kameshwar
Cooper v. Cervan, Esq. et al
as 3:2014cv00958
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
William P. Cervan, Esq., Chief Prosecutor 8th Judicial Circuit and State Attorney Offices Baker County, Macclenny, FL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipps v. State Of Florida et al
as 6:2014cv00918
Plaintiff:
Ra P. Shipps
Defendant:
State Of Florida, #62 Prosecutor's Office, Division #62 Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Rosenblum, Esq. et al
as 3:2013cv01485
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Ms. Rosenblum, Esq., States Attorney Prosecutor, Angela Corey, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01449
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
