Cases 41 - 50 of 81
COTTLE v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
CHARLES COTTLE
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLLINS v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00651
Plaintiff:
MARCUS COLLINS
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTS v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00656
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PITTS
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, DAN MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHAVEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARMICHAEL v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
OBIE CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00495
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00496
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWBER v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE LOWBER
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRANT v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
RASHFORD GRANT
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHIELDS v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SHIELDS
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
