Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Microsoft Corporation v. Patel
as 2:2010cv01671
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Arun Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
The Primage Corporation v. Shore Bank Pacific et al
as 3:2010cv05000
Plaintiff:
The Primage Corporation
Defendant:
Shore Bank Pacific, Adam Monshi, David C.E. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Patel v. Kent School District et al
as 2:2009cv01223
Plaintiff:
Madhuri Patel and Madhuri Patel
Defendant:
Kent School District, Kent School District, Kent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patadia v. Isilon Systems Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02011
Plaintiff:
Phenil Patadia and Phenil Patadia
Defendant:
Isilon Systems Inc, William D Ruckelshaus, Steven S Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Denger et al v. Isilon Systems Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01992
Plaintiff:
Kirby D Denger, Kirby D Denger, David W Hooper and others
Defendant:
Isilon Systems Inc, William D Ruckelshaus, Steven S Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Youakim v. Isilon Systems Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01764
Plaintiff:
Marcel Youakim, Kirby D Denger, David W Hooper and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Dr. Magdy Fouad and Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust
Defendant:
Isilon Systems Inc, William D Ruckelshaus, Stevens S Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Patel v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00901
Petitioner:
Ramesh Patel
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patel v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00354
Petitioner:
Satish Patel
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A. Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
