Cases 41 - 50 of 57
HOEVER v. CREWS, et al
as 4:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, R HOSFORD, E WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. AAA Pest Protection, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv62120
Plaintiff:
Altavious Lenard Smith , Michael Hipolito Amaro , Tavell Anthony Moore and others
Defendant:
AAA Pest Protection, Inc. and William Robles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tullous v. McCowen et al
as 6:2011cv01523
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Tullous
Defendant:
Jeff McCowen, Lowell "Rick" Miller, Marie Vigue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulk v. United States of America
as 9:2011cv80768
Plaintiff:
Cedric Paulk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Paulk v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida et al
as 9:2011cv80619
Plaintiff:
Dexter Paulk
Defendant:
City of Riviera Beach, Florida , Nir Mordechay and David Bodenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALVAREZ v. WELLHAUSEN
as 4:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
PEDRO CAMILO ALVAREZ
Defendant:
G WELLHAUSEN, DIANE ANDREWS, JOHN L BOCKELMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAULK v. MCNEIL
as 5:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
JOHN M PAULK
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, KATHLEEN L FUHRMAN and CHARLES D TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAULK v. MCNEIL
as 1:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
JOHN M PAULK
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulk v. Tripod Aluminum, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv02048
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Ulysses Paulk, Jr.
Defendant:
Tripod Aluminum, Inc. and Vincent Tripodi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jeanovil v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv22270
Petitioner:
Nedson Jeanovil
Respondent:
Ashley Paulk
Amicu:
United States Attorney's Office for Middle District of Georgia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
