Cases 41 - 50 of 345
Myers et al v. Racerworld LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01335
Plaintiff:
Nicole Myers and Emily Peters
Defendant:
Racerworld, LLC doing business as Bourbon Street, Arizona Cabarets, LLC, DCA Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spot Tech House, Ltd et al
as 2:2021cv00632
Defendant:
Spot Tech House, Ltd, Malhaz Pinhas Patarkazishvili, Spot Option, Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Markel American Insurance Company v. PLI Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02279
Defendant:
William E Miller II, Ronald H Leventhal, PLI Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrahms v. May et al
as 2:2020cv02060
Defendant:
John P Cahill, Gary M Metzger, Peter A Mehring and others
Plaintiff:
Simon Abrahms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Robinson et al
as 3:2020cv00624
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Juliette Robinson and Peter Garibaldi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrum v. Charles Woodman Law Firm et al
as 3:2020cv00573
Defendant:
Peter Smith, Charles Woodman Law Firm and Charles Woodman
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmitt v. Walgreens
as 2:2020cv01751
Plaintiff:
Peter Schmitt
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
