Cases 41 - 50 of 401
Peterson v. Administration Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv05799
Plaintiff:
Gregory Peterson
Defendant:
Administration Cook County Department of Corrections, Tom Dart and Superintendent of Division 9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
QBE Insurance Corporation v. Danna, LLC d/b/a Catalyst Modern Energy et al
as 3:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Danna, LLC d/b/a Catalyst Modern Energy, Andrew Nooleen, Kim Nooleen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Svanda et al v. Jackson County et al
as 3:2021cv00909
Plaintiff:
Jason Svanda, Clifton E. Basden, Dan Bost and others
Defendant:
Jackson County, C.J. Calandro, Richard E Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Peterson v. Saul
as 3:2021cv50185
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kathy Lynn Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Yomarth, BYZJJH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06990
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06995
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
