Cases 41 - 50 of 204
Waseem Daker v. Joyette Holmes, et al
as 20-13601
Defendant / Appellee:
AMELIA G. PRAY, Assistant District Attorney, Cobb County District Attorney's Office, MICHAEL W. ALMAND, Court Reporter, CHRISTINA WILLOUGHBY, Admin. Specialist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Daker v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2020cv02650
Defendant:
District Attorney Joyette Holmes, Amelia G. Pray, D. Victor Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALLAMO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89663
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DECLAN PRAY MALLAMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83032
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROY PRAY MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77764
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRAIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv72082
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KEMP PRAIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05245
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PRAY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daker v. Holmes et al
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant:
Diane M. Stark, Amelia G. Pray, Kathleen Sherwood and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nag Investments, LLC v. 7950 Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00113
Plaintiff:
NAG INVESTMENTS, LLC and NJG Investments, LLC
Defendant:
D.F. PRAY, INC. a/k/a DF PRAY CONSTRUCTION, 7950 INVESTMENTS, LLC, Scott W. Pray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
