Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Moore v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01374
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Moore
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, Prison Review Board, Pinckneyville C.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burks v. Durbin et al
as 2:2017cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Burks
Defendant:
Louis A Durbin, Macon County Courthouse and Prison Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Maloney et al
as 1:2017cv01475
Plaintiff:
Adam C Smith
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, Kurt Bode, Robert C Bollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections Records Office et al
as 2:2017cv02243
Plaintiff:
Albert L Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections Records Office, Prisoner Review Board, Champaign County Parole Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Prisoner Review Board
as 3:2017cv50240
Petitioner:
Lennox Lawrence
Respondent:
Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Butler et al
as 3:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
Eugene Horton
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Vonetta Harris, Jon Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavette v. Illinois Dept of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv05280
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavette
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Correction, Prisoner Review Board and J. Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaglicic v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
as 1:2017cv01863
Plaintiff:
Eric Jaglicic
Defendant:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Butler et al
as 1:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Eugene Horton
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Vonetta Harris, Jon Burge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv03330
Plaintiff:
Mickey Ball
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, Illinois Prisoner Review Board Chairman and James Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
