Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2009cv00024
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. York County Public Defenders Office
as 2:2008cv03834
Plaintiff:
John Alan Miller
Defendant:
York County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pearson v. STBG Parole and Probation and Pardon Service et al
as 4:2008cv03137
Plaintiff:
Warren L Pearson
Defendant:
STBG Parole and Probation and Pardon Service, Spartanburg Detention Facility, William S Hall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kirby v. Hodges et al
as 3:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
Travis Austin Kirby
Defendant:
Kathleen J Hodges, Clay T Allen and Spartanburg County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Harris v. Public Defender Office
as 4:2007cv02921
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Harris
Defendant:
Public Defender Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brown v. Lexington County Public Defenders Office et al
as 4:2007cv02723
Plaintiff:
Derrick J Brown
Defendant:
Lexington County Public Defenders Office, Arie D Box and Matthew C Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bridges v. Stone et al
as 0:2007cv02529
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bridges
Defendant:
Issac McDuffie Stone, III, Laura Carroway, Beaufort County Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Samuel v. Proctor et al
as 2:2007cv01586
Plaintiff:
Eric Samuel
Defendant:
Lori D Proctor, Boyd Young and Charleston County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Samuel v. Proctor et al
as 3:2007cv01586
Plaintiff:
Eric Samuel
Defendant:
Lori D Proctor, Boyd Young and Charleston County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
