Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Ayala v. Ayers et al
as 3:2010cv00979
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Ayala
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, D. A. Dacanay, R. W. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solis v. Havilland et al
as 2:2009cv02795
Plaintiff:
Alberto Solis
Defendant:
John Havilland, A. W. Singh, R. W. Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Hubbard, et al
as 2:2009cv02488
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson, Sr.
Defendant:
Susan L Hubbard, J.W. Haviland, R. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Wong et al
as 2:2009cv02388
Plaintiff:
Dearel Gibson
Defendant:
R. K. Wong, J. W. Haviland, D. K. Sisto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jones et al v. R. W. Nipper et al
as 2:2009cv05679
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Defendant:
R. W. Nipper, B. M. Cash, Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuilaepa v. Ayers et al
as 3:2009cv02954
Plaintiff:
Paul Tuilaepa
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Jr., Max S. Lemon, D. A. Dacanay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Haviland et al
as 2:2009cv01364
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brooks
Defendant:
J. W. Haviland, V. Sing, Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brasure v. Ayers et al
as 5:2009cv01166
Plaintiff:
Spencer Rawlins Brasure
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Jr., R. W. Fox, B Grundy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paul Rogers Jackson v. Matthew Cate et al
as 2:2009cv01326
Plaintiff:
Paul Rogers Jackson
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Robert Ayers, Jr, F. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jones v. R. W. Nipper et al
as 2:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Defendant:
R. W. Nipper, B. M. Cash, Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
