Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 121
PEROZA-BENITEZ v. LAWLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv03684
Petitioner: JOSE ANTONIO PEROZA-BENITEZ
Respondent: RAYMOND ,/ LAWLER and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muhammad Leach v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 10-3104
Plaintiff - Appellant: MUHAMMAD LEACH
Defendant - Appellee: RAYMOND LAWLER, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Steven Sistek v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 10-3054
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN SISTEK
Defendant - Appellee: RAYMOND LAWLER, ATTY GEN PA and DA WESTMORELAND
Ferguson v. Lawler, et al
as 10-2972
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOUGLAS T. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee: RAYMOND LAWLER, Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, ATTY GEN PA and DA CLEARFIELD
Gary Wallace v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 10-2968
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee: RAYMOND LAWLER, DA LEHIGH and ATTY GEN PA
Carter v. Lawler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv01266
Plaintiff: Fred Carter
Defendant: Raymond Lawler, Charles Mitchell, Robert B. MacIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Beard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv01129
Plaintiff: Keith Stanley Brown
Defendant: Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D., Richard Ellers, Raymond Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. LAWLER et al
as 5:2010cv02163
Petitioner: GARY WALLACE
Respondent: RAYMOND LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quevi v. Lawler et al
as 3:2010cv00869
Petitioner: Kevin Richard Quevi
Respondent: Raymond Lawler, D.O.C. Superintendent of SCI-Huntingdon and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?