Cases 41 - 50 of 148
Roche v. Dee
as 1:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Julie H. Dee
Plaintiff:
Jason Alan Roche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niesslein v. Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al
as 7:2019cv10328
Defendant:
MDINR, LLC and Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Niesslein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Jiang v. Acacia Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07267
Defendant:
Laurinda Y. Pang, David J. Aldrich, Benny P. Mikkelsen and others
Plaintiff:
John Jiang
Pierson v. Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05318
Defendant:
Wendy Yarno, Lowell W. Robinson, John W. Vander Vort, J.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pierson
Doughman v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04214
Defendant:
Sergeant Christopher Roche, Officer #3214, William Maisonet and others
Plaintiff:
Jia Doughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE AT&T/DIRECTTV NOW SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv02892
Defendant:
Richard W. Fisher, Cynthia B. Taylor, John J. Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gross
Lead Plaintiff:
Evan Hassiotis, Martin J. Boot, Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds and others
Petitioner:
KBC Asset Management NV and Pro-Alpha Investments Limited
Rix et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11798
Plaintiff:
Patrick Stranzl, John D. Snow, William Schumacher and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Acosta et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11464
Plaintiff:
Beth Kutis, William Acosta, Helen White and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Ainslie et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11293
Plaintiff:
John Lissaris, Frances Dunniway, Faye Balbosa and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
