Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Turner v. Prieto et al
as 2:2010cv00756
Plaintiff:
Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
Ed G. Prieto, Sheriff's Department Detention Facility, D Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. City of Woodland et al
as 2:2009cv03326
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
City of Woodland, County of Yolo, Barrientos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Turner v. Spence, et al
as 09-17461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
SPENCE, Officer, Badge #346, YOLO COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DIRECTOR OF MONROE DETENTION CENTER and others
Anthony Turner v. Yolo County, et al
as 09-15757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY R.G. TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY, CITY OF WOODLAND, AVRID JOHNSON and others
DeSantos v. Yolo County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv02669
Plaintiff:
Robert Leo DeSantos, Jr.
Defendant:
Yolo County Detention Center and Rademaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AIG Agency Auto, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00703
Plaintiff:
AIG Agency Auto, Inc.
Defendant:
Randall R. Rademaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Yolo County et al
as 2:2007cv01861
Plaintiff:
Anthony R.G. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County, City of Woodland, Avrid Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tafoya v. Prieto et al
as 2:2007cv01598
Plaintiff:
Russell L. Tafoya
Defendant:
Ed Prieto, T. Day, Rademaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRITSCH USA INC. v. BRUCE et al
as 2:2007cv03527
Plaintiff:
FRITSCH USA INC.
Defendant:
JAMES E. BRUCE and RADEMAKER USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
