Cases 41 - 50 of 60
McQuitty et al v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
Floyd McQuitty and Christina McQuitty
Defendant:
Roberto Ramirez and CF Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aldaba v. Happy Mexican, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02347
Plaintiff:
Lizeth Aldaba
Defendant:
Happy Mexican, LLC and Rafael Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez-Mendoza v. Maury County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Ramirez-Mendoza
Defendant:
Maury County, Tennessee and Bobby Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez v. Happy Mexican-Winchester, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02043
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Marquez
Defendant:
Happy Mexican-Winchester, LLC and Rafael Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Daniels v. HCA Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01170
Plaintiff:
Julius Daniels
Defendant:
HCA Holdings, Inc. , Richard M. Bracken , R. Milton Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Kishtah v. HCA Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01098
Plaintiff:
Rafat Kishtah
Defendant:
HCA Holdings, Inc. , Richard M. Bracken , R. Milton Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Cowie v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2011cv00687
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ronald Cowie
Defendant:
Analisa Ramirez, Carl W. Miller and Deborah J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mejia et al v. Jaynes et al
as 1:2011cv01157
Plaintiff:
Jose Mejia and Regoberto Ramirez
Defendant:
Joyce C. Jaynes , Jack Hicks, Inc. Corporation , Jack Hicks Trucking Company and others
Miscellaneou:
Kathy Blount
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jimenez-Ramirez v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv02443
Petitioner:
Joel Jimenez-Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AREVALO et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2011cv02339
Plaintiff:
NUVIA AREVALO , RAUL GONZALEZ , RUBEN GUEVARA and others
Defendant:
UMHP PROPERTIES INC, UMH SALES AND FINANCE and GAIL WHITTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
