Cases 41 - 50 of 294
JONES v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JONES
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERNAN CONWAY, BRIAN H. HAIMM and others
WILSON v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERNAN CONWAY, BRIAN H. HAIMM and others
SCHEID v. FEIGIN et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE SCHEID
Defendant:
GERALD A. FEIGIN, EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ, HALEY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURGESS v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv20029
Defendant:
Diana Burgess, WALMART, INC., WALMART STORES EAST, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2021cv19495
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and FATHER & SON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kofford et al v. Brachel Marketing et al
as 2:2021cv16794
Plaintiff:
James Kofford, Colton Hair, Dylan Hair and others
Defendant:
Brachel Marketing an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company doing business as LONE GOOSE BAKERY, BRANDON MCCARTHY, Rachel Mccarthy and others
Cross Claimant:
Ultra Trading International Corp
Cross Defendant:
Bedemco Import-Export, Brachel Marketing, Fuerst Day Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
