Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Renfro v. James
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Billy Richard Renfro, Jr
Defendant:
Tosha James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Azlin et al v. Silicon Valley, Inc
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2011cv00688
Plaintiff:
Junie S. Azlin , Amanda Cardenas , Gilbert Collier and others
Defendant:
Silicon Valley, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renfro v. DePuy Inc et al
as 3:2011cv02306
Plaintiff:
Loraine Renfro
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Renfro v. Astrue
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2009cv02400
Plaintiff:
Mark Renfro
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Howard v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2009cv03056
Plaintiff:
Gregory Howard
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds, E. A. Renfroe and Joseph Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.