Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Garcia Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01358
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Garcia Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Delgado-Delfin v. Pugh
as 4:2013cv01271
Petitioner:
Jose Ricardo Delgado-Delfin
Respondent:
Michael Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Tambi et al
as 2:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jones
Defendant:
Samuel Tambi, Jerry Tucker, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardona v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23821
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Cardona
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00498
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Edgar Ricardo Morales Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alanis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22890
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Alanis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes v. City of Wyoming et al
as 1:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
Ricardo P Dukes
Defendant:
Sergeant Brian Berigan, Earl's Towing, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20951
Plaintiff:
Ricardo D. McDonald
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
