Cases 41 - 50 of 75
William Davis v. J. Darrell Hart, et al
as 10-14549
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM HOPE DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL HART, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, GAIL L. BUCKNER and others
Curtis Echols, Jr. v. Gail Buckner, et al
as 10-14367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE ECHOLS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL L. BUCKNER, ROBERT E. KELLER, GARLAND R. HUNT and others
Robert Heard v. Georgia DOC, et al
as 10-14279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. KELLER, L. GALE BUCKNER and others
Slakman v. Buckner et al
as 1:2010cv02918
Plaintiff:
Barry Steven Slakman
Defendant:
L. Gale Buckner, James Donald, Robert E. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ann Keller et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
as 8:2010cv01370
Plaintiff:
Ann Keller, Kimberley Keller, Robert W. Keller and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
Phillip Green v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 10-14006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP LEE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, GAIL L. BUCKNER, ROBERT E. KELLER and others
Heard v. Donald et al
as 1:2010cv02630
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
James Donald, Robert E. Keller, L. Gale Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawud v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles Members et al
as 1:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles Members, John Does, L. Gale Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Echols v. Buckner et al
as 1:2010cv02481
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Echols, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Gale Buckner, Robert E. Keller, Garland R. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armour v. Donald et al
as 1:2010cv02166
Plaintiff:
Dutch L. Armour
Defendant:
James Donald, L. Gale Buckner, Robert E. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
