Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Brown v. Warden Kerr;
as 2:2014cv00105
Petitioner:
Rodrick Lee Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beck et al v. ISC Constructors LLC
as 1:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Lyle Dean Deskin, Manuel Alaniz Rios, Henry Alejandro Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
ISC Constructors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez et al v. ISC Group, Inc
as 1:2013cv00636
Plaintiff:
Tomas Eduardo Alvarez , Miguel Angel Barrera , Ashley Warren Bolton and others
Defendant:
ISC Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hardin v. Thaler et al
as 6:2013cv00060
Respondent:
Warden Brian Blanchard and Rick Thaler
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Rodrick Sterlin Hardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv03659
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Thomas
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Vernon K Pitman, Tony R. Ohare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beck et al v. A&L Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00556
Defendant:
ISC Constructors, LLC, Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc., PCL Industrial Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Lyle Dean Deskin, Manuel Alaniz Rios, Henry Alejandro Gonzalez and others
Petitioner:
Motiva Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Griffin v. Thaler
as 1:2012cv00202
Petitioner:
Rodrick Lavaur Griffin
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv00711
Petitioner:
Rodrick Carter
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Russell v. USA
as 1:2011cv00288
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodrick Chad Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
