Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Portillo v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., et al.
as 3:2013cv00369
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and Sears Roebuck and Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Luisa Portillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Droplets, Inc. v. eBay, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00401
Plaintiff:
Droplets, Inc.
Defendant:
eBay, Inc. , Nordstrom, Inc. , Overstock.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Austin v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
as 7:2013cv00471
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd.
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Best Buy Co., Inc., Costco Wholesale Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shields v. Sears Roebuck And Company et al
as 4:2013cv02426
Plaintiff:
Joe Shields
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck And Company , Home Improvement Leads Inc , Direct Energy US Home Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Advansa B.V. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
as 2:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Advansa B.V.
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
