Cases 41 - 50 of 52
CONSUMER ADVISORY, et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSIONER, et al
as 2:1991cv00321
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER ADVISORY BOARD , AMELIA DOE , MARY B DOE and others
Defendant:
DESHAIES, ROGER , HARTLEY, DONALD and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GOODRICH v. OUELLETTE et al
as 2:2009cv00536
Plaintiff:
DAVID W GOODRICH
Defendant:
MAURICE R OUELLETTE , LEO ROGERS , MICHAEL VITIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROGERS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
GERALD LINWOOD ROGERS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. INNES
as 2:2009mc00056
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Defendant:
ROGER G INNES
USA et al v. KENDRICK
as 2:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
USA and MAINE, STATE OF
Defendant:
C ROGER KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
DESJARDINS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
ROGER DESJARDINS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BALDWIN v. BADER et al
as 2:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER G BALDWIN
Defendant:
JOHN W BADER , STEVEN P BOULET , MICHAEL L BROUSSEAU and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2008cv00275
Plaintiff:
ROGER BURTON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TAYLOR v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MAINE DEPT
as 2:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
ROGER K TAYLOR
Defendant:
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MAINE DEPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
