Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Gresham et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv03129
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gresham, Sean Rome Hill, Detainees in all Georgia Jails and others
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, The Office of the State's Attorney, The Office of the Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimmerman v. The City of Rome, Georgia et al
as 4:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Patrick Seaborn Zimmerman
Defendant:
The City of Rome, Georgia , Edward Cox , Jon Sisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. GGNSC Rome, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03600
Plaintiff:
Nellie Smith
Defendant:
GGNSC Rome, LLC , GGNSC Holdings, LLC , Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. GGNSC Rome, LLC
as 4:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Sarah Doris Freeman
Defendant:
GGNSC Rome, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 4:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 3:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 7:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS ALLEGEHNEY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 4:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
