Cases 41 - 50 of 158
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-55937
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Phillips v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv07206
Plaintiff:
Eric Phillips
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, San Quentin State Prison and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2022cv05569
Plaintiff:
Amir Shabazz
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coles v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv05349
Plaintiff:
George E. Coles
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Michael Nickerson, et al v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 22-16513
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL VAUGHN NICKERSON, EUGENE SAMUEL HALL, CHARLES CARTER, Sr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, RON BROOMFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99011
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Maury v. Seamon et al
as 4:2022cv04463
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Maury
Defendant:
C. Seamon, Ron Broomfield and Connie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saif'ullah v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv05017
Plaintiff:
Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah and Fernando Jackson
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv05126
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mills
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey
as 5:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
Michael Mackey
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, R. Reseler, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
