Cases 41 - 50 of 83
FERRERA v. EDWARDS
as 2:2020cv01119
Petitioner:
JONATHAN FERRERA
Respondent:
DIRECTOR RONALD P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2019cv21391
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES, JOHN DOES 1-7 and RONALD P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21286
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21282
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20706
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPEIGHT v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2019cv20742
Defendant:
G. CALHOUN-BUTLER, RONALD P. EDWARDS, MICHAEL A. CONRAD and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN C. SPEIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18940
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18617
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THE ESTATE OF CARLOS BORROTO et al v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv17148
Defendant:
JOHN DOE JAIL PERSONNEL AND/OR CORRECTIONS OFFICERS 1-5 (FICTITIOUS INDIVIDUALS) IN THEIR OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, RONALD P. EDWARDS, CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CARLOS BORROTO AND MARITZA CLARK AND ERIC FRIAS, AS ADMINISTRATORS AD PROSEQUENDUM FOR THE ESTATE OF CARLOS BORROTO and THE ESTATE OF CARLOS BORROTO AND MARITZA CLARK AND ERIC FRIAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
