Cases 41 - 50 of 100
George et al v. United Healthcare Services, Inc
as 3:2025cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brooke George and Christopher George
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 ERISA - Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rousseau v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Respondent:
Tracy Zephier, Judge Brenda Claymore, Kelsie Haskell and others
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Rousseau
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Tribal Habeas Corpus
Performance Energy Services, LLC v. Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Performance Energy Services, LLC
Defendant:
Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Grand Forks County Social Services
as 3:2024cv00158
Defendant:
Grand Forks County Social Services
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.