Cases 41 - 50 of 1,034
Pierson v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Aaron Nathaniel Pierson
Defendant:
Monica Smtih, Mary Martin, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Brion Lee Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crawford v. Rowland et al
as 5:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Richard Stanley Crawford
Defendant:
Sgt. Adam Rowland, Matthew Whittington, Charlie Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. City of Lawton et al
as 5:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Mark H Long
Defendant:
City of Lawton, James T Smith, Detective Melanie Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 6:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Linda Gray
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Michael Boger, Kristine Kusner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. LA MDC
as 5:2023cv00996
Petitioner:
Nicois Megale Smith
Respondent:
LA MDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
