Cases 41 - 50 of 615
Scott v. Fitz
as 1:2022cv00316
Petitioner:
Quincy D Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Betty Williams and Nathan Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montpelier v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dale J Montpelier and Dale J Montpelier, Sr.
Defendant:
John & Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nance, Sr v. Obion County et al
as 1:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Rodney Nance, Sr
Defendant:
Obion County and State Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Fowlkes, et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02695
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, L.T. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson and Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, Lt. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 2:2022cv02783
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Dorsey and Unknown Superior Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
