Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Saunders et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13066
Plaintiff:
Pamela Saunders and John Saunders
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Saunders v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11546
Plaintiff:
Donna Saunders
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10812
Plaintiff:
Karin Saunders and William S. Saunders
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv05184
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Saunders
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milhouse v. O'Brien
as 1:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien , Odom, J. Gully and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Saunders v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33921
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Saunders
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders-White v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv14966
Plaintiff:
Patricia Saunders-White
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saunders et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv13958
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Saunders and Gary Franklin Saunders
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saunders v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09629
Plaintiff:
Velma Saunders
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
