Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Gibbs et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv08340
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn A. Gibbs and Lanita Drew
Defendant:
City of New York , Raymond W. Kelly , Karl Schaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kessler v. Schaeffer et al
as 1:2012cv08086
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kessler
Defendant:
Richard Schaeffer, Brian Ferdinand, Liquid Holdings Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bonano v. Alonso et al
as 1:2012cv03646
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Defendant:
Daniel Alonso, Mark Dwyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaeffer v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv04448
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Schaeffer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Belfon v. Schaeffer et al
as 2:2011cv02005
Plaintiff:
Suzette Belfon
Defendant:
Janet I Schaeffer, M.D., P.C. and Janis I. Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Berbick et al v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2011cv01821
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Berbick and Clive Berbick
Defendant:
Johanna Gutierrez, Baseemah Potts, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schaeffer et al v. Senario, LLC
as 1:2011cv00506
Plaintiff:
Gary Schaeffer and Mel Birnkrant
Defendant:
Senario, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Schaeffer v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv06382
Plaintiff:
William A. Schaeffer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Staring et al v. Transport Employers Association et al
as 5:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Staring , John Bulgaro , Ronald G. Lucas and others
Defendant:
Transport Employers Association , Robert L. Schaeffer, Jr., John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Schaeffer v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07968
Plaintiff:
Gary Schaeffer
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Amazon. Com, Inc., Barnes & Noble, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
