Cases 41 - 50 of 125
LEOTIE v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01521
Defendant:
RUBIN LUBIN, OCWEN MORTGAGE, NATURES POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ABYOKE LEOTIE and KEISHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NETIS v. SUN WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv01517
Defendant:
ERNEST CODILIS, SUN WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS) and others
Plaintiff:
MAHAL NETIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHROEDER v. CARL TOWE & ASSOCIATES et al
as 1:2018cv01179
Plaintiff:
C. JOE SCHROEDER
Defendant:
CARL TOWE & ASSOCIATES, CARL TOWE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUNG v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv00962
Plaintiff:
GLORIA SUN JUNG
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , SHAUNA MORIE SMITH , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BLUNT v. GOVERNOR et al
as 1:2018cv00717
Petitioner:
SAMUEL BLUNT
Respondent:
GOVERNOR, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TOWN OF RALEIGH, SHERIFF OFFICE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JENKINS v. BRAZORIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 1:2017cv02803
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
BRAZORIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. SEWARD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 1:2017cv02798
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
SEWARD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 1:2017cv02797
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. SEWARD COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2017cv02378
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
SEWARD COUNTY SHERIFF and K.B.I. CITY POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
XELUP v. WHITE et al
as 1:2017cv02048
Plaintiff:
TUSHKAHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
ROBERT TODD WHITE, MARK GERBINO, CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
