Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Simmons et al v. Boys & Girls Club Of The Pikes Peak Region, et al
as 1:2016cv01461
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Simmons
Defendant:
Boys & Girls Club Of The Pikes Peak Region and James M. Sullivan III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Premier Group, Inc., The v. Bolingbroke et al
as 1:2015cv01469
Plaintiff:
Premier Group, Inc., The
Defendant:
Darren Boyd Bolingbroke , Heidi McNulty , Michael Shane Collard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craven v. Vienot et al
as 1:2015cv00773
Plaintiff:
Michael Roy Craven, Jr.
Defendant:
Tammy L. Vienot, Terri B. Wood, Rhonda L. Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson et al v. Simmons
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Galen L. Amerson and Joyce E. Amerson
Defendant:
Tom Simmons, Andrew Knutson, Robert Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simmons v. Hinton et al
as 1:2013cv02566
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Simmons
Defendant:
Bryce Hinton, Scott Bird, Rodney Fenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Trani et al
as 1:2013cv01273
Petitioner:
Leo Simmons
Respondent:
Travis Trani and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simmons v. Lindell et al
as 1:2013cv01176
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Simmons
Defendant:
James W. Lindell and Lindell Real Estate, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Lindell Real Estate, LLC and James W. Lindell
Counter_defendant:
Lee M. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Simmons v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv03366
Plaintiff:
Leo Simmons
Defendant:
Tom Clements, James Falk and Andrea Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Shulman et al
as 1:2012cv02993
Plaintiff:
Howard M. Watts, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas Shulman, Michael Astrue, Carolyn Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
