Cases 41 - 50 of 217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
Treyon Antonio Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff John Wilcher, Captain Blanton, Cpl. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02117
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Earnest Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. MINCEY et al
as 5:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN and YISRA
Defendant:
SAMUEL WADE MCCORD doing business as MACON BIBB CO TAX COLLECTOR, ERICA WOODFORD doing business as MACON BIBB COUNTY CLERK OF THE COURT, JUDGE DAVID L MINCEY, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MORALES et al
as 5:2021cv00138
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSE MORALES, DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, LT CLUBPER and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01530
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Spencer and Rabecca Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. James et al
as 4:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, CPL Kelly James, CPL Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Savon R. D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Dana Holloway Spencer
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FITZGERALD v. CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
DEWYAN RENARD FITZGERALD and SHARRIEF BEY
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, SPENCER, CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SPENCER v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 3:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Core Civic, Warden Vance Laughlin and Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
