Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Smith et al v. Medtronic Inc. et al.
as 4:2013cv02220
Plaintiff: Joyce Smith , Julie Hance , Jonathan Kent Hance and others
Defendant: Medtronic Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01506
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. One Erma-WErke 9MM Machine Gun, et al
as 4:2013mc00280
Defendant: One Sterling Armanment Company 9MM Machine Gun, One Erma-WErke 9MM Machine Gun and One Steyr-Daimler MP40 9MM Machine Gun
Plaintiff: USA
Sterling v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2012cv06112
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff: Quoetta Sue Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grace v. Hakala et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00081
Plaintiff: William Grace
Defendant: Michael Hakala, John Mattews, Becky Lizenbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01621
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grace v. Sterling et al
as 1:2010cv00117
Plaintiff: William Grace
Defendant: Kimberly Sterling, Terry Mitchell, Beckie Lizenbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv04249
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04249
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McClain v. Routhmeir Sterling, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00690
Plaintiff: Ronda McClain
Defendant: Routhmeir Sterling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?