Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Allen v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
as 1:2015cv02183
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Allen
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Escalera v. Harry et al
as 1:2015cv02132
Plaintiff:
Dominic Escalera
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Becker, James Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. BERNSTEIN et al
as 2:2015cv04899
Petitioner:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
MARK I. BERNSTEIN, R. SETH WILLIAMS, EVAN SILVERSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03139
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MORRIS
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION, INC. and SERGIO MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUINN-SWIFT v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02583
Plaintiff:
MARTHA S. QUINN-SWIFT
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCoy-Gibson v. Hubber et al
as 3:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCoy-Gibson
Defendant:
A. Hubber, B. McBeth, Cleaveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLER et al v. CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KELLER and KRISTI KELLER
Defendant:
CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICE, INC. , CENTRAL REFRIGERATED TRANSPORTATION, INC. , SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Gordon v. Flowers et al
as 3:2014cv02396
Plaintiff:
Tod A Gordon
Defendant:
Flowers, Swift, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speck v. Munley et al
as 3:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
William E Speck
Defendant:
Thomas J Munley, Michael Barrasse, Andrew J. Jarbola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crook v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Esther Crook
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Third_party_defendant:
Crystal White
Third_party_plaintiff:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
