Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Rizvi v. Wachovia Bank National Association et al
as 1:2010cv00881
Plaintiff:
Syed Rizvi
Defendant:
Wachovia Bank National Association , John Stumpf, Paul Ackerman and others
Rizvi v. Suntrust Mortgage et al
as 2:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
Syed Ali Rizvi
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Suntrust Mortgage, Suntrust Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type:
Other Statutes
Syed v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02485
Plaintiff:
Khalid H. Syed and Khalid H. Syed
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Syed v. Astrue
as 1:2009mi00349
Plaintiff:
Khalid H. Syed and Khalid H. Syed
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Global Wire Inc et al v. Arkansas Best Corp et al
as 1:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
Global Wire Inc, Wyre Wynd Life Wire, Inc and Montgomery Wire Corp
Defendant:
Arkansas Best Corp, ABF Freight Sys Inc, AVERITT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Crown Imports et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv03197
Plaintiff:
Crown Imports and Syed Mohammad Saeed Shah
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Donald Monica and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Strickland et al v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02190
Plaintiff:
Brenda Strickland and Corey Williams
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Syed Rizvi, Brian Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
