Cases 41 - 50 of 54
BANKS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2014cv04569
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY , US COURT OF APPEALS 3RD CIRCUIT , JIM BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03264
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00071
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. U.S DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY et al
as 2:2013cv03237
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
U.S DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY, ROSS L. WICHARD, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00117
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OBIANYO v. STATE OF TENNESSEE et al
as 1:2012cv05320
Plaintiff:
UCHENNA N. OBIANYO
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AONDOAKAA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 2:2011cv07226
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KAASE AONDOAKAA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06779
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
AONDOAKAA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 2:2010cv05184
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KAASE AONDOAKAA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
