Cases 41 - 50 of 54
TROUT v. ASTRUE
as 5:2010cv06530
Plaintiff:
HEATHER TROUT
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
TROUT v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv00756
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. TROUT
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TROUT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2010cv02040
Plaintiff:
LORI TROUT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Trout et al v. Wentz et al
as 1:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
Marlyn Trout and Jordin Trout
Defendant:
William Wentz, Karen Comery, Officer Hivner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TROUT et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84192
Plaintiff:
ROYCE TROUT, ROYCE TROUT, DOROTHY TROUT and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TROUT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv03590
Plaintiff:
MICHELE M. TROUT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TROUT et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2009cv02685
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TROUT and MARIA TROUT
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GALIETTI et al
as 2:2008cv01523
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REBECCA L. GALIETTI, MARY BETH TROUT, STANLEY A. HILINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
TROUT et al v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89064
Plaintiff:
RALPH C TROUT and RALPH C TROUT
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., BAIRNCO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TRENT v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv03676
Plaintiff:
ANGELA C. TROUT
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
