Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Bogroff v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01601
Plaintiff:
Tammy R. Bogroff
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Smith et al v. Nevada West Recycling Corp et al
as 3:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
J. E., P. M. and Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Stanley Levers and Nevada West Recycling Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jamal Damon Hendrix v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00560
Defendant:
Linda C. Adams, Anderson, Michael Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00553
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Tammy A. Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
New Balance, Inc. v. LaCrosse Technology, LLC; et al
as 2:2014cv01937
Defendant:
LaCrosse Technology, LLC and Tammy Delores Lier
Plaintiff:
New Balance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wilson v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01465
Plaintiff:
Tammy Wilson
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brandt v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
Tammi Brandt
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hernandez et al v. Allied Collection Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00744
Defendant:
Allied Collection Services, Inc. and Michael L. Feeney
Plaintiff:
Jose Ricardo Hernandez and Tammy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Weddle v. Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00241
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Dwayne Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Weddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
