Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Thomas v. Olson et al
as 1:2016cv00696
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Thomas
Defendant:
Olivett, Travis Trani, Internal Classification Committee Chairman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilar v. Trani et al
as 1:2016cv00645
Petitioner:
Lazaro Aguilar
Defendant:
Travis Trani and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Toevs v. Quinn et al
as 1:2015cv02838
Plaintiff:
Janos Toevs
Defendant:
James Quinn, Nicole Gellar, John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apodaca, et al v. Raemisch, et al
as 15-1454
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JONATHAN APODACA and JOSHUA VIGIL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, his individual capacity and TRAVIS TRANI, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, in his individual capacity
Glaser v. Trani et al
as 1:2015cv02427
Petitioner:
Douglas A. Glaser
Respondent:
Travis Trani and Cynthia A. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowe v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01830
Plaintiff:
Donnie Lowe
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Travis Trani, Rick (I) Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Beatte et al
as 1:2015cv01645
Plaintiff:
Richard Rodgers
Defendant:
Beatte, Elizabeth Hogan, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olguin v. Trani
as 1:2015cv01643
Plaintiff:
Felix Paul Olguin
Defendant:
Travis Trani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintana v. Trani et al
as 1:2015cv01569
Petitioner:
Angel Quintana
Respondent:
Travis Trani and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petrie v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01467
Plaintiff:
Michael Petrie
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Travis Trani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
