Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Johnson v. Gelios et al
as 1:2008cv00999
Petitioner:
Rasheen Johnson
Respondent:
Troy Williamson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Williamson et al
as 1:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Rasheen Johnson
Defendant:
Troy Williamson, USP-Lewisburg and Receiving and Discharge staff at USP-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Geritano v. Williamson
as 4:2008cv00811
Petitioner:
Battista Geritano
Respondent:
Troy Williamson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Williamson et al
as 4:2008cv00784
Plaintiff:
David A. Johnson
Defendant:
Troy Williamson, E. Bradley and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jibril Ibrahim v. DC, et al
as 08-5098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jibril L. Ibrahim
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, United States of America, Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Charleswell v. Chambers et al
as 4:2008cv00736
Plaintiff:
Brunet Charleswell
Defendant:
B. Chambers, Troy Williamson, D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gardner v. Williamson et al
as 5:2008cv02050
Petitioner:
Barkley Gardner
Respondent:
Troy Williamson and U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gardner v. Williamson et al
as 5:2008hc02050
Petitioner:
Barkley Gardner
Respondent:
Troy Williamson and U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Landon v. Williamson
as 3:2008cv00578
Petitioner:
Clarence Landon
Respondent:
Troy Williamson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jermaine Levy v. State of Ohio, et al
as 08-3324
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERMAINE L. LEVY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, NANCY H. ROGERS, Attorney General, State of Ohio, MARC E. DANN, Attorney General, State of Ohio and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
