Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Haley, Sr., et al v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 12-5168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY WAYNE HALEY, SR., an individual
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HALEY, an individual, ASHLEY HALEY, an individual, S.H., an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA
Defendant:
TULSA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Lemmons v. Collins, et al
as 12-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBIN DON LEMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORBIN COLLINS, KEVIN STATTS, JAMES HENDERSON and others
Baker v. Holt, et al
as 12-5029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD L. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY HOLT, GLENWOOD APARTMENTS, CLAY COFFMAN and others
Luginbyhl Hawkins v. United States, et al
as 12-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI MCRAE LUGINBYHL HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CLAIRE V. EAGAN and others
Hawkins v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl Hawkins
Defendant:
United States of America, US Department of Justice, Claire V Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Tulsa Police Department, et al
as 11-5108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LAWLESS, S. JONES, C. LAGRONE and others
Defendant:
TULSA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Klenda v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00112
Plaintiff:
John W Klenda
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of , Tulsa Police Department and Jay Chiarito-Mazzarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker vs. Holt, et al
as 4:2011cv00092
Plaintiff:
Donald L Baker
Defendant:
Kathy Holt , Glenwood Apartments , Clay Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Conley v. Tulsa Police Department
as 4:2010cv00813
Plaintiff:
Theresa R Conley
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tottress vs. City of Tulsa, The, et al.
as 4:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Earl Tottress
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, Tulsa Police Department, Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
