Cases 41 - 50 of 80
BURKE v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2015cv01151
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BURKE
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2014cv01818
Petitioner:
WILLIAMS H. EVANS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv02057
Petitioner:
KRISTOPHER SIMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HERNDON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01929
Petitioner:
JOHN K. HERNDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01656
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HIRSCH v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2013cv01473
Plaintiff:
GARY HIRSCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2013cv00667
Plaintiff:
XAVIER FLORES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT AND BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and UNITED STATES MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LITTLE v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00379
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
