Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
FILING ERROR
as 1:2011cv00796
Defendant:
Dr. Barbara Christy, Dr. Mohan Natarajan and University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Plaintiff:
Dr. Richard Tamfu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamfu v. Natarajan et al
as 5:2011cv00758
Defendant:
Dr. Barbara Christy, Dr. Mohan Natarajan and University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Plaintiff:
Dr. Richard Tamfu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tapp v. University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston - School of Dentistry
as 4:2011cv02971
Plaintiff:
Stephen Tapp
Defendant:
University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston - School of Dentistry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
210) 567-6962 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King, ex rel., et al. v. University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston
as 4:2011cv00018
Defendant:
University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston
Plaintiff:
Terri King and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
