Cases 41 - 50 of 4,318
Krouse et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mills Krouse, Paige E. Krouse and Daniel Mills Krouse 1989 Trust UAD December 26, 1989
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Brazier v. USA
as 3:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Kevin L Brazier
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Randle v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Payne T Randle
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDRES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
GREG ANDRES and PAULA ANDRES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Cory Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Letner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Joshua R Letner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GIGURE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
TYLER GIGURE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $61,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$61,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant:
ARTHUR KHARATYAN
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Hartleroad v. USA
as 1:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Kevin Hartleroad
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Casillas v. USA
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Roger Casillas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
