Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Turner v. Grimm et al
as 9:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Victor Randolphe Turner, Jr
Defendant:
Cindi Grimm and Friends of Jerry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Fourstar v. USA
as 4:2013cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2012cv00194
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Costa et al v. United States Department of Interior
as 1:2012cv00033
Petitioner:
Larry Costa and Victor Singer
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Morris v. USA
as 1:2012cv00021
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
George Victor Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeMaio et al v. Weitzeil et al
as 1:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Victor DeMaio and Don Tangwall
Defendant:
Woodrow Weitzeil , Kent Sipe , Shawn Lesnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alweis et al v. Impact Petroleum et al
as 1:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Don Alweis , Eugene Brosovich , Carol Brosovich and others
Defendant:
Impact Petroleum , William Daily, Charles W. Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fourstar v. USA
as 4:2009cv00105
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fourstar v. Zemyan
as 4:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Louise Zemyan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fort Peck Sisseton and Wahpeton Sioux Executive Council et al v. Boyd et al
as 4:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
Fort Peck Sisseton and Wahpeton Sioux Executive Council, Agnes Ward, Myrna First and others
Defendant:
David E. Boyd, Sr., Donna Buckles-Whitmer, Midge Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
