Cases 41 - 50 of 205
Lawson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv01526
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Lawson and Kenneth Wade Lawson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00491
Plaintiff:
Krista Rollins and Wade Ray Rollins
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Mike's Pipe Inspection, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Mike's Pipe Inspection, Inc., Billy Myers, Barbara Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29740
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Peterson , Veronica Rascon , Caroline Sanducci and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29612
Plaintiff:
Mildred Wade
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruitt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28748
Plaintiff:
Sherry A. Pruitt and Ralph H. Wade
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28336
Plaintiff:
Diana Wade
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. Huttonsville Correctional Center
as 5:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stuart Wade
Defendant:
Huttonsville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv27057
Plaintiff:
Diana Wade
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv26959
Plaintiff:
Frances Wade and C. E. Wade
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
