Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Wang v. Jie Jie Sheng Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv06090
Defendant:
Jie Jie Sheng Corp., John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10 and Xiaohu Zhao
Plaintiff:
Wei Wang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2015cv07482
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G., Montblanc-Simplo GMBH and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Jing Mi Ling, et al.,, Jing Mi Ling and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ding et al v. Man Wei & Son US Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04982
Plaintiff:
Ai Min Ding and Jin Wei Wang
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Wei Jun Liang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Yang v. Holder
as 14-3088
Petitioner:
Qiong Yang and Wei Wang
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wang v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Wei Wang
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Le Kun Wu et al v. Magnus Sunhill Group LLC et al
as 2:2012cv08047
Defendant:
Central Escrow Inc, Does, Si Lau and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Wu, Lee Kun Wu and Lee Kun Wu
Lin v. Wang et al
as 1:2012cv03769
Defendant:
M.D. Salman Achar, Amara Anbradha, M.D. Thuy Phung Lu and others
Plaintiff:
Xin Pei Lin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lenovo Mobile Communication Technology (HK) Ltd. v Wang, et al
as 1:2012cv21501
Plaintiff:
Lenovo Mobile Communication Technology (HK) Ltd.
Defendant:
Wei Wang and Dawn Trade and Invest Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
