Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WANG v. HACHI AUTHENTIC JAPANESE RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
WEI WANG
Defendant:
HACHI AUTHENTIC JAPANESE RESTAURANT, INC. agent of D/B/A HACHI SUSHI, JASON JIE-DI CHAN, HUOMING LI and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wang et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
as 1:2022cv04306
Plaintiff:
Wei Wang and Ming Lu
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
FORTUNE COMPANIES, INC. v. KIPCOR 219, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01857
Plaintiff:
FORTUNE COMPANIES, INC.
Defendant:
KIPCOR 219, LLC
Cross Defendant:
JMC PROPERTY GROUP, LLC, CITY OF KOKOMO, STEVEN W. HARTWIG and others
Cross Claimant:
JMC PROPERTY GROUP,LLC, JOEY KIMBROUGH and HONGE WANG
Counter Claimant:
WEI XI and FANG RONG
Counter Defendant:
FORTUNE COMPANIES,INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
