Cases 41 - 50 of 169
TORRENCE v. WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv00135
Defendant:
FRANCO, I. RANDOLPH, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHELBY TORRENCE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUZIER v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00099
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, SAMUEL BYRD, MARY CHAVEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARC COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton v. Wexford Medical et al
as 3:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Stanton
Defendant:
Dorothy Livers, Wexford Medical, Smith and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANDLEY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, DUAN PEARCE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HANDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. PLUMMER et al
as 1:2020cv03246
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL HEALTH CARE, I. RANDOLPH, JEREMY JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCants v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv01055
Plaintiff:
Keith R McCants and Keith Rene McCants
Defendant:
Sgt. A Lagunas, Ron Neal, Wexford Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, KENNY MITCHELL, J. MANUEL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00900
Defendant:
Walser, Wexford Medical, Indiana State of and others
Plaintiff:
Jharon Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slone v. Wexford Medical et al
as 3:2020cv00864
Defendant:
Wexford Medical, Noe Marandet and Len. Ivers
Plaintiff:
Robert Slone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
