Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Lawrence v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2014cv14360
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southgate v. SoundSpark, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13861
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Jeremy Southgate
Defendant:
SoundSpark, Inc., Ana Villanueva, Christopher Nolte and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Mullins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2014cv12620
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Naila Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 4:2013cv40098
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Margaret Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
VERRINDER v. WAL-MART CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv11147
Plaintiff:
William Verrinder and United States of America
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated, Sears Holding Corporation, Kmart and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Strangie et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv10514
Plaintiff:
Susan Strangie and Stephen Strangie
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and HomeCare Labs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv12149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hilliker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 1:2011cv11125
Plaintiff:
Erik Hilliker
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc , Wal-mart.com, Inc. , Ultimate Brand Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
